Skip to content

Mukesh Butani

  • Home
  • About
  • Media
  • Home
  • About
  • Media
  • Publications

Why Judicial Antiavoidance Has No Place in Assessments

  • Mukesh Butani
  • February 24, 2026

Share this:

why-judicial-antiavoidance-has-no-place-in-assessments-img1

Mukesh Butani and Seema Kejriwal explain why applying judicial antiavoidance rules independent of general antiavoidance rules would replace rule‑based uniformity in the enforcement of tax liability with enforcement that is discretionary and arbitrary.

Read more..

Share this:

SUBSCRIBE TO MY BLOG

RECENT POSTS

IFA 2026 Residential Conference

The Engine Room of Innovation: Can the India-US Tax Treaty Survive an AI-Dollar Deluge?

OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines: A framework in motion

The Cryptographic Celestia and India’s Next-Gen Policy Ambitions

Tax Academy of Singapore’s 20th Anniversary Conference

Pacific Rim Tax Conference 2026

CATEGORIES

  • Publications
  • Panel Discussions
  • News Articles
  • Podcast
  • India: GST
  • India: Income Tax
  • India: Legal
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • International Tax
  • Archives

SEARCH

CONNECT

X-twitter Linkedin
PrevPreviousOf hope and Hail Mary! Disencumbering the fine print of the India-US interim trade deal
NextSpecial discussion for Union Budget 2026-27 by Business TodayNext

CATEGORIES

  • Publications
  • Panel Discussions
  • News Articles
  • Podcast
  • India: GST
  • India: Income Tax
  • India: Legal
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • International Tax
  • Archives

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Media

SEARCH

Copyright © Mukesh Butani. 2026 • All rights reserved.
Linkedin X-twitter