Skip to content

Mukesh Butani

  • Home
  • About
  • Media
  • Home
  • About
  • Media
  • Publications

Why Judicial Antiavoidance Has No Place in Assessments

  • Mukesh Butani
  • February 24, 2026

Share this:

why-judicial-antiavoidance-has-no-place-in-assessments-img1

Mukesh Butani and Seema Kejriwal explain why applying judicial antiavoidance rules independent of general antiavoidance rules would replace rule‑based uniformity in the enforcement of tax liability with enforcement that is discretionary and arbitrary.

Read more..

Share this:

SUBSCRIBE TO MY BLOG

RECENT POSTS

International Fiscal Association’s 78th Congress in Melbourne, Australia

The Changing Taxation of Buy-backs in India

Data centres: certainty matters more than incentives

6th ITL – International Tax Law & Policy Research Network’s Annual Conference in Zurich

Panel discussion on “Independent Directors: Custodians of Governance in the Digital Era”

India’s role in UN tax co-operation convention

CATEGORIES

  • Publications
  • Panel Discussions
  • News Articles
  • Podcast
  • India: GST
  • India: Income Tax
  • India: Legal
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • International Tax
  • Archives

SEARCH

CONNECT

X-twitter Linkedin
PrevPreviousOf hope and Hail Mary! Disencumbering the fine print of the India-US interim trade deal
NextSpecial discussion for Union Budget 2026-27 by Business TodayNext

CATEGORIES

  • Publications
  • Panel Discussions
  • News Articles
  • Podcast
  • India: GST
  • India: Income Tax
  • India: Legal
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • International Tax
  • Archives

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Media

SEARCH

Copyright © Mukesh Butani. 2026 • All rights reserved.
Linkedin X-twitter